<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran Press</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Organizational Culture Management</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-6942</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>25</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparative Foundations of a Theory of Knowledge   by Using Conversion  Process Knowledge  in Organizations</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Comparative Foundations of a Theory of Knowledge   by Using Conversion  Process Knowledge  in Organizations</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>115</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>144</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">29916</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jomc.2012.29916</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abdolhosein</FirstName>
					<LastName>Khosropanah</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Abravesh</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Organizational knowledge creation theory of innovation and knowledge creation in organizations, tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. SECI and knowledge will be a four-step process explains how to use the new organization was created. This theory of the coversion process  from  tacit  knowledge  to explicit  and viceversa  based on the idealism  agent. Ontological  view of the theory  is numynalysty  and  doesnt   realistic  reality of  objective.On the other hand in the theory  of knowledge human presented as understandable and active stock and  he is the  creator  of the information.
The idea of using interpretive methodology discourse analysis and poststructuralism  are among postmodern theories.
Epistemology of the criterion  of truth, the match is the true measure of a firm depends on the base. The ontology slso accepting realism to disting the true litmus test cases are self governors. And human in Islamic thought have discovered  data and phenomena  and simply to explore the relationship between phenomena.  The method does not affect each  factor  in the explanation of the phenomenon.  And  any  internal  or external factors  does not interfere  to absolute in explanation of the theory. In other words the factors  that led to the relative phenomena  and  theories  are  considered  invalid  and  the   methodology   and  the  explanation of   phenomena  does not play.
Finally  replacement  of the basic theory  principles  and  methodology,  we can see that the process of implicit  and explicit  knowledge  back  in to the  organization   to   create new  knowledge  SECI  will never happen, ...</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Organizational knowledge creation theory of innovation and knowledge creation in organizations, tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. SECI and knowledge will be a four-step process explains how to use the new organization was created. This theory of the coversion process  from  tacit  knowledge  to explicit  and viceversa  based on the idealism  agent. Ontological  view of the theory  is numynalysty  and  doesnt   realistic  reality of  objective.On the other hand in the theory  of knowledge human presented as understandable and active stock and  he is the  creator  of the information.
The idea of using interpretive methodology discourse analysis and poststructuralism  are among postmodern theories.
Epistemology of the criterion  of truth, the match is the true measure of a firm depends on the base. The ontology slso accepting realism to disting the true litmus test cases are self governors. And human in Islamic thought have discovered  data and phenomena  and simply to explore the relationship between phenomena.  The method does not affect each  factor  in the explanation of the phenomenon.  And  any  internal  or external factors  does not interfere  to absolute in explanation of the theory. In other words the factors  that led to the relative phenomena  and  theories  are  considered  invalid  and  the   methodology   and  the  explanation of   phenomena  does not play.
Finally  replacement  of the basic theory  principles  and  methodology,  we can see that the process of implicit  and explicit  knowledge  back  in to the  organization   to   create new  knowledge  SECI  will never happen, ...</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Conversion  process knowledge</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Epistemology...</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Knowledge creating</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">organization</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Postmodern</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jomc.ut.ac.ir/article_29916_eb836fb3332f45051e913bd26a76614c.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
