فهم کنش نهادی مدیریت منابع انسانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدة مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران

2 گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدة معارف اسلامی و مدیریت، دانشگاه امام صادق(ع)، ایران

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش فهم کنش نهادی مدیریت منابع انسانی است. برای انجام پژوهش، 20 مصاحبة نیمه‏ساختاریافته بر اساس نمونه‏گیری هدفمند و اشباع نظری صورت گرفت و از طریق تحلیل مضمون 68 مضمون پایه، 14 مضمون سازمان‏دهنده و 4 مضمون فراگیر پس از کدگذاری مجدد انتخاب شد. مضامین فراگیر عبارت‌اند ‏از زمینة نهادی، کنش‏ها، تضادها، اقدامات و مضامین سازمان‏دهندة زمینة نهادی HRM عبارت‌اند از پیچیدگی نهادی، نوع فعالیت، تغییر نهادی، کنشگران HRM. کنشگران HRM از طریق هوش نهادی ابعاد زمینة نهادی را درک می‏کنند و اقدامات خود را با منطق HRM از طریق دو دسته کنش فعال و غیر‏فعال معنا می‏بخشند؛ به عبارتی جاری‏سازی اقدامات بر اساس شیوة معنابخشی به منطق نهادی در منطق HRM است. کنش‏های فعال شامل کار نهادی و کارآفرینی نهادی، سفارشی‏سازی، متنوع‏سازی گزینشی، ترکیب‌کردن، اهرم‏سازی، به‏روزآوری، بازآفرینی، و یکپارچه‏سازی منطق‏های نهادی در منطق HRM و کنش‏های ساختاری سازماندهی کنش‏گرا و شبکه ‏سازی و چابک‏سازی است. کنش‏های غیرفعال شامل مشروع‏سازی منطق HRM در زمینة پیوند سست، اولویت‏دهی، استانداردسازی، و متناسب‏سازی منطق‏های نهادی در منطق HRM و تعدیل و برون‏سپاری ساختار می‏شود. این کنش‏ها در پاسخ به سه دسته از تضادها، شامل تضاد منطق HRM با منطق‏های نهادی، تضاد منطق HRM با منطق‏های نهادی متعارض و تضادهای منطق HRM (شامل تضاد منطق HRM با منطق سازمان، تضاد بین منطق اقدامات، تضادهای درون منطق اقدامات HRM) است. بر اساس یافته‏ها، الگوی مفهومی پژوهش ارائه شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


Almandoz, J. (2012). Arriving at the starting line: The impact of community and financial logics on new banking ventures. Academy of management Journal, 55(6), 1381-1406.‏
Arman, R., Kadefors, R., & Wikström, E. (2021). ‘We don't talk about age’: a study of human resources retirement narratives. Ageing & Society, 1-27.‏
Aust, I., Brandl, J., Keegan, A., & Lensges, M. (2017). Tensions in managing human resources. The oxford handbook of organizational paradox, 413.‏
Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13(5), 653-676.‏
Battilana, J. & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440.‏
Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). 2 how actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65-107.‏
Beer, M., Boselie, P., & Brewster, C. (2015). Back to the future: Implications for the field of HRM of the multistakeholder perspective proposed 30 years ago. Human Resource Management, 54(3), 427-438.‏
Bévort, F. & Poulfelt, F. (2015). Human resource management in professional services firms: Too good to be true? Transcending conflicting institutional logics. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(2), 102-130.‏
Bjerregaard, T. & Jonasson, C. (2014). Managing unstable institutional contradictions: The work of becoming. Organization Studies, 35(10), 1507-1536.‏
Blaikie, N. (2007). Approaches to social enquiry: Advancing knowledge. Polity.‏
Boon, C., Paauwe, J., Boselie, P., & Den Hartog, D. (2009). Institutional pressures and HRM: developing institutional fit. Personnel Review.‏
Borghouts-van de Pas, I. & Freese, C. (2021). Offering jobs to persons with disabilities: A Dutch employers’ perspective. Alter, 15(1), 89-98.‏
Boselie, P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human resource management journal, 15(3), 67-94.
Boussebaa, M. (2009). Struggling to organize across national borders: The case of global resource management in professional service firms. Human Relations, 62(6), 829-850.‏
Boxall, P. & Purcell, J. (2003). Strategic HRM: ‘best fit’or ‘best practice’. Strategy and human resource management, 1, 47-70.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.‏
Bunduchi, R., Tursunbayeva, A., & Pagliari, C. (2019). Coping with institutional complexity: Intersecting logics and dissonant visions in a nation-wide healthcare IT implementation project. Information Technology & People.‏
Chapman, E. F., Sisk, F. A., Schatten, J., & Miles, E. W. (2018). Human resource development and human resource management levers for sustained competitive advantage: Combining isomorphism and differentiation. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(4), 533-550.‏
Chaudhry, S. & Rubery, J. (2019). Why do established practices deinstitutionalize? An actor‐centred approach. British Journal of Management, 30(3), 538-557.‏
Chowdhury, S. D. & Mahmood, M. H. (2012). Societal institutions and HRM practices: an analysis of four European multinational subsidiaries in Bangladesh., 23(9), 1808-1831.‏
Claus, L. & Kroezen, J. (2016). How Do Institutional Paradoxes Evolve? The Gender Equality Paradox in Professional Tennis. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2016, No. 1, p. 14026). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.‏
Cleveland, J. N., Byrne, Z. S., & Cavanagh, T. M. (2015). The future of HR is RH: Respect for humanity at work. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 146-161.‏
Dachner, A. M., Ellingson, J. E., Noe, R. A., & Saxton, B. M. (2021). The future of employee development. Human Resource Management Review, 31(2), 100732.‏
D'Aunno, T., Sutton, R. I., & Price, R. H. (1991). Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: A study of drug abuse treatment units. Academy of management journal, 34(3), 636-661.‏
Decramer, A., Smolders, C., Vanderstraeten, A., & Christiaens, J. (2012). The impact of institutional pressures on employee performance management systems in higher education in the low countries. British Journal of Management, 23, S88-S103.
Delbridge, R. & Edwards, T. (2013). Inhabiting institutions: Critical realist refinements to understanding institutional complexity and change. Organization Studies, 34(7), 927–947.
Di Pietro, F., Monaghan, S., & O'Hagan‐Luff, M. (2022). Entrepreneurial finance and HRM practices in small firms. British Journal of Management, 33(1), 327-345.‏
DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 147-160.‏
Edwards, T., Sanchez-Mangas, R., Jalette, P., Lavelle, J., & Minbaeva, D. (2016). Global standardization or national differentiation of HRM practices in multinational companies? A comparison of multinationals in five countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(8), 997-1021.‏
Friedland, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, 232-263.‏
Greenwood, R. & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management journal, 49(1), 27-48.‏
Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R., & Whetten, D. (2014). Rethinking institutions and organizations. Journal of management studies, 51(7), 1206-1220.‏
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management annals, 5(1), 317-371.‏
Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of management journal, 45(1), 58-80.‏
Harrell-Cook, G. & Ferris, G. R. (1997). Competing pressures for human resource investment. Human Resource Management Review, 7(3), 317-340.‏
Hatch, M. J. & Cunliffe, A. L. (2013). Organization theory: modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. Kindle Version. Retrieved from Amazon. com.‏
Héliot, Y., Gleibs, I. H., Coyle, A., Rousseau, D. M., & Rojon, C. (2020). Religious identity in the workplace: A systematic review, research agenda, and practical implications. Human Resource Managemnt, 59(2), 153-173.‏
Hillebrink, C., Schippers, J., van Doorne‐Huiskes, A., & Peters, P. (2008). Offering choice in benefits: a new Dutch HRM arrangement. International Journal of Manpower.‏
Hodgson, D., Paton, S., & Muzio, D. (2015). Something old, something new?: Competing logics and the hybrid nature of new corporate professions. British Journal of Management, 26(4), 745-759.‏
Holm, P. (1995). The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative science quarterly, 398-422.‏
Hotho, J., Minbaeva, D., Muratbekova-Touron, M., & Rabbiosi, L. (2020). Coping with favoritism in recruitment and selection: a communal perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 165(4), 659-679.‏
Huang, W. (2016). Responsible pay: managing compliance, organizational efficiency and fairness in the choice of pay systems in China’s automotive companies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(18), 2161-2181.‏
Ierodiakonou, C. & Stavrou, E. (2017). Flexitime and employee turnover: the polycontextuality of regulation as cross-national institutional contingency. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(21), 3003-3026.‏
Jackson, S., Schuler, R., & Jiang, K. (2014). An aspirational framework for strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 1–56.
Jancsary, D., Meyer, R. E., Höllerer, M. A., & Barberio, V. (2017). Toward a structural model of organizational-level institutional pluralism and logic interconnectedness. Organization Science, 28(6), 1150-1167.‏
Jarzabkowski, P., Smets, M., Bednarek, R., Burke, G., & Spee, P. (2013). Institutional ambidexterity: Leveraging institutional complexity in practice. In Institutional logics in action, part B. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.‏
Kaiser, U., Kongsted, H. C., Laursen, K., & Ejsing, A. K. (2018). Experience matters: The role of academic scientist mobility for industrial innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 39(7), 1935-1958.‏
Kaufman, B. (2015). Evolution of strategic HRM as seen through two founding books: A 30th anniversary perspective on development of the field. Human Resource Management, 54(3), 389–407.
Keegan, A., Bitterling, I., Sylva, H., & Hoeksema, L. (2018). Organizing the HRM function: Responses to paradoxes, variety, and dynamism. Human Resource Management, 57(5), 1111-1126.‏
Kim, S. & Chung, S. (2016). Explaining organizational responsiveness to emerging regulatory pressure: the case of illegal overtime in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(18), 2097-2118.‏
Kitchener, M. (2002). Mobilizing the logic of managerialism in professional fields: The case of academic health centre mergers. Organization studies, 23(3), 391-420.‏
Knardal, P. S. (2020). Orchestrating institutional complexity and performance management in the performing arts. Financial Accountability & Management, 36(3), 300-318.‏
Kodeih, F. & Greenwood, R. (2014). Responding to institutional complexity: The role of identity. Organization Studies, 35(1), 7-39.‏
Konrad, A. M., Yang, Y., & Maurer, C. C. (2016). Antecedents and outcomes of diversity and equality management systems: An integrated institutional agency and strategic human resource management approach. Human Resource Management, 55(1), 83-107.‏
Lawrence, T. B. & Suddaby, R. (2006). 1.6 institutions and institutional work. The Sage handbook of organization studies, 215-254.‏
Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of management inquiry, 20(1), 52-58.‏
Legge, K. (1995). Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities in Macmillan. Basingstoke, Hants.‏
Legge, K. (2005) Human resource management: Rhetorics and realities. Anniversary Edition. London: Palgrave MacMilan.
Lewis, A. C., Cardy, R. L., & Huang, L. S. (2019). Institutional theory and HRM: A new look. Human resource management review, 29(3), 316-335.‏
López-Fernández, M. & Pasamar, S. (2019). Coercive pressures for the implementation of health and safety practices: are they enough?. Employee Relations: The International Journal.‏
Lu, W., Saka-Helmhout, A., & Piekkari, R. (2019). Adaptation of compensation practice in China: The role of sub-national institutions. Management and Organization Review, 15(2), 235-267.‏
Luo, J., Chen, J., & Chen, D. (2021). Coming back and giving back: transposition, institutional actors, and the paradox of peripheral influence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(1), 133-176.‏
Luo, X. R., Wang, D., & Zhang, J. (2017). Whose call to answer: Institutional complexity and firms’ CSR reporting. Academy of management journal, 60(1), 321-344.‏
Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657-679.‏
Marano, V. & Kostova, T. (2016). Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practices in multinational enterprises. Journal of Management Studies, 53(1), 28-54.‏
Martin, G., Farndale, E., Paauwe, J., & Stiles, P. G. (2016). Corporate governance and strategic human resource management: Four archetypes and proposals for a new approach to corporate sustainability. European Management Journal, 34(1), 22-35.‏
Martin, G., Siebert, S., & Robson, I. (2018). Conformist innovation: An institutional logics perspective on how HR executives construct business school reputations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(13), 2027-2053.‏
Martin-Alcazar, F., Romero-Fernandez, P. M., & Sanchez-Gardey, G. (2005). Strategic human resource management: integrating the universalistic, contingent, configurational and contextual perspectives. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 633-659.‏
Meijerink, J., Bondarouk, T., & Maatman, M. (2013). Exploring and comparing HR shared services in subsidiaries of multinational corporations and indigenous organisations in the Netherlands: A strategic response analysis. European Journal of International Management, 7(4), 469-492.‏
Meijerink, J., Keegan, A., & Bondarouk, T. (2021). Having their cake and eating it too? Online labor platforms and human resource management as a case of institutional complexity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(19), 4016-4052.‏
Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340-363.‏
Meyer, R. E. & Höllerer, M. A. (2016). Laying a smoke screen: Ambiguity and neutralization as strategic responses to intra-institutional complexity. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 373-406.‏
Moore, G. & Grandy, G. (2017). Bringing morality back in: Institutional theory and MacIntyre. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(2), 146-164.‏
Moses, A. & Sharma, A. (2020). What drives human resource acquisition and retention in social enterprises? An empirical investigation in the healthcare industry in an emerging market. Journal of Business Research, 107, 76-88.‏
Murphy, C., Klotz, A. C., & Kreiner, G. E. (2017). Blue skies and black boxes: The promise (and practice) of grounded theory in human resource management research. Human Resource Management Review, 27(2), 291-305.‏
Nolan, C. T., Garavan, T. N., & Lynch, P. (2020). Multidimensionality of HRD in small tourism firms: A case study of the Republic of Ireland. Tourism Management, 79, 104029.‏
Nolan, J. (2011). Good guanxi and bad guanxi: Western bankers and the role of network practices in institutional change in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(16), 3357-3372.‏
Nwagbara, U. (2020). Exploring how institutions shape managerialist employment relations and work-life balance (WLB) challenges in Nigeria. Employee Relations: The International Journal.‏
Orton, J. D. & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203-223.‏
Paauwe, J. (2004). HRM and performance: Achieving long-term viability. Oxford University Press on Demand.‏
------------. (2009). HRM and performance: Achievements, methodological issues and prospects. Journal of Management studies, 46(1), 129–142.
Pache, A. C. & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of management review, 35(3), 455-476.‏
----------------------------. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of management journal, 56(4), 972-1001.‏
Powell, W. W. (1998). “Institutional theory”, in Cooper, C.L. and Argyris, C. (Eds), Encyclopedia of Management, Blackwell, Oxford.
Priem, R. L. & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research?. Academy of management review, 26(1), 22-40.‏
Raaijmakers, A. G., Vermeulen, P. A., Meeus, M. T., & Zietsma, C. (2015). I need time! Exploring pathways to compliance under institutional complexity. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 85-110.‏
Ren, S. & Jackson, S. E. (2020). HRM institutional entrepreneurship for sustainable business organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 30(3), 100691.‏
Sandholtz, K. W. & Burrows, T. N. (2016). Compliance police or business partner? Institutional complexity and occupational tensions in human resource management. In The structuring of work in organizations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.‏
Saqib, S. I., Allen, M. M., & Wood, G. (2022). Lordly Management and its Discontents:‘Human Resource Management’in Pakistan. Work, Employment and Society, 36(3), 465-484.‏
Scheibmayr, I. & Reichel, A. (2021). Beating the advertising drum for the employer: How legal context translates into good HRM practice. Human Resource Management Journal.‏
Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage publications.‏
Seet, P. S., Jones, J., Acker, T., & Jogulu, U. (2021). Meaningful careers in social enterprises in remote Australia: employment decisions among Australian Indigenous art centre workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(8), 1643-1684.‏
Smets, M., Burke, G. T., Jarzabkowski, P., & Spee, P. (2012). Reinsurance Trading in Lloyd's of London: Balancing Conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice: Best Paper Proceedings Academy of Management. In 72nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2012.
Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. T., & Spee, P. (2015). Reinsurance trading in Lloyd's of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 932-970.
Smith, W. K. & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of management Review, 36(2), 381-403.‏
Suddaby, R. & Viale, T. (2011). Professionals and field-level change: Institutional work and the professional project. Current Sociology, 59(4), 423-442.‏
Thornton, P. H. & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801-843.‏
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press on Demand.‏
Tina Dacin, M., Goodstein, J., & Richard Scott, W. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of management journal, 45(1), 45-56.‏
Tracey, P., Creed, W. D., Smith, W. K., Lewis, M. W., Jarzabkowski, P., & Langley, A. (2017). Beyond managerial dilemmas. The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox, 162.‏
Ulrich, D. & Dulebohn, J. H. (2015). Are we there yet? What's next for HR?. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 188-204.‏
Voronov, M. & Yorks, L. (2015). “Did you notice that?” Theorizing differences in the capacity to apprehend institutional contradictions. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 563-586.‏
Westermann-Behaylo, M., Berman, S. L., & Van Buren III, H. J. (2014). The influence of institutional logics on corporate responsibility toward employees. Business & Society, 53(5), 714-746.‏
Wulaningrum, P. D., Akbar, R., & Sari, M. R. (2020). Isomorphism, Human Resource Capability and Its Role in Performance Measurement and Accountability. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(12), 1099-1110.‏
Xavier, B. (2014). Shaping the future research agenda for compensation and benefits management: Some thoughts based on a stakeholder inquiry. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 31-40.‏
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.‏
Zhang, M. (2020). Rational actions or institutional actions: A study on the rationality in academic librarians' decision-making processes when purchasing e-book products. Library & Information Science Research, 42(2), 101018.‏