Study of Organizational Factors affecting the Academic Research Commercialization Strategy (Case Study: Nanotechnology)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 M.S., Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Ranked ninth in Nano-science production, Iran has a bright and hopeful perspective to exploit business opportunities and create wealth of this technology. Universities and research centers as organizations in where researchers study, play an effective role in research commercialization. The purpose of this research is to identify and prioritize organizational factors affecting commercialization strategy for nanotechnology research in Iran. Method of this research is quantitative-qualitative. Data collection was conducted through semi structured interviews in qualitative part and through questionnaire in quantitative part. Data analysis methods were 3-stage coding in qualitative part and factor analysis and Annova test in quantitative part. Results indicate 30 organizational factors in nine major categories that affect the nanotechnology research commercialization strategy. These factors include the priority of infrastructures of university, knowledge management, strategy and quality of faculties, the nature and direction of the business, networks of university, university management, human resources, and financial resources of the University. In most of cases, the influence of organizational factors on choose of Spin Off companies strategies is more than the same on the other ones.
 

Keywords


  1. بندریان، رضا (1388). «بازاریابی و تجاری­سازی فناوری­های جدید: مراحل، عوامل تسهیل­کننده و کلیدی موفقیت»، فصلنامه تخصصی رشد فناوری، شماره 19، صص39- 45.
  2. تدبیری، سیروس و رستمی، علیرضا، (1384). سازمان و مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.
  3. داوری، علی، (1391). دوره آموزشی نرم­افزار Smart PLS، دانشکده کارآفرینی دانشگاه تهران.
  4. ستاد توسعه فناوری نانو، (1391). «گزارش ارزیابی جایگاه ایران در فناوری نانو: اسفند 1390»، ماهنامه فناوری نانو، شماره 175، صص9- 12.
  5. ستاد توسعه فناوری نانو، (1390). چهارمین جشنواره فناوری نانو.
  6. سرمد، زهره، بازرگان، عباس و حجازی، الهه (1388). روش­های تحقیق در علوم رفتاری، انتشارات آگاه.
  7. سلطان دهقان، مرتضی، (1390). «وضعیت یازده صنعت بزرگ در فناوری نانو: مارس 2011»، ماهنامه فناوری نانو، شماره 163، صص33- 47.
  8. فکور، بهمن، (1385). «مروری بر مفاهیم نظری تجاری­سازی نتایج تحقیقات»، نشریه رهیافت، بهار و تابستان، 37، صص 32-24.
  9. فکور، بهمن (1386). «شرایط زمینه­ساز برای پیشبرد تجاری­سازی نتایج تحقیقات در بخش دانشگاهی»، نشریه رهیافت، شماره 40، صص 55-46.
  10. کلانتری، اسماعیل، دارستانی فراهانی، امیر، مرادی، عباس، (1390). نانو از نو، چاپ سوم، ستاد ویژه توسعه فناوری نانو.
  11.  هداوند، مهدی، (1385). «قراردادهای انتقال فناوری، تدبیر»، شماره 167، صص 48-42.
  12.  هومن، حیدر علی، (1389). شناخت روش علمی در علوم رفتاری، سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه­ها.
  13. Akhavan, A. N. , Bagheri, A. , Jabbari, N. , (2008). “An Empirical Studying of Barriers for Technology Transfer: The case of Iran”, IEEE, 978-1-4244-2330-9/08.
  14. Biernacki, P., Waldorf, D., (1981). “Snowball Sampling: Problems and techniques of Chain Referral Sampling”, Sociological methods and research, 10(2), pp. 141- 163.
  15. Choi, Y. R. and P. H. Phan, (2006). “The Influences of Economic and Technology Policy on the Dynamics of New Firm Formation”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 26, PP. 493-503.
  16. Daft, R. L., (1992). Organization Theory and Design, New York, West publishing company.
  17. Del Campo, A.A., A. Sparks, R.C. Hill and R.T. Keller (1999). “The transfer and commercialization of university-developed medical imaging technology: Opportunities and problems”, IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 46(3),289-298
  18. Everett M., Rogers, (2003). “University System: the case of Chalmers University of Technology”, Research policy, Vol.32, pp. 1555-1568.
  19. Feynman, Richard, (1959), “There is plenty of room at the bottom”, Caltech Institute, p.12. URL: http://www.zyvax.com/nanotech/feynman.html
  20. Ford, D., Saren, M., (1996). Technology Strategy for Business, International Thomson Business Press, London.
  21. Friedman, J. and Silberman, J., (2003). “University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management and Location Matter?”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), pp. 81-85.
  22. Jasinki, Andrzej H. , (2009). “Barriers for technology transfer: the case of a country in transition”, Journal of Technology Management, in China, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 119-131.
  23. Kerlinger, F. N., (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.
  24. Kuzel, A.J., (1999). Sampling in Qualitative Inquiry, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  25. Lowe, J., Taylor, P., (1998). “R&D Technology Purchase through License Agreements: Complementary Strategies and Complementary Assets”, R&D Management, 28(4), pp. 263-278.
  26. O’Shea, Rory P. , Chugh, Harveen, Allen, Thomas J. , (2008). “determinants and consequences of university spinoffs activity: a conceptual framework”, J Techno Transfer, 33: 653-666.
  27. Palmberg, Christopher, Denirs, Helene, Miguet, Claire, (2009). “Nanotechnology, An Overview Based On Indicators And Statistics”, OECD, STI working paper, p.53
  28. Pirnay,F., Surlemont,B., Nlemvo,F., (2003). “Toward a Typology of University Spinoffs”, Small Business Economics, 21 (4) PP.355-369.
  29. Robbins, S. P., (1994). Management, 6th ed., Prentice Hall Inc.
  30. Shane, S. (2004). Academic Entrepreneurship: university spinoffs and wealth creation, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar.
  31. Umum, K.K., Dhewanto, W., Larso, D., (2008). Higher education institution and technology transfer, AGSE.
  32. Yadollahi,  F. J., Talebi, K (2009). “ Application of Knowledge Management for Research Commercialization”, World Academy of science Engineering and Technology, 49, pp. 451- 455.