Abstract: Study of Kant's deontological Ethics in Organization (and comparison of it with pillars of worldly ethic in Organization)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 MSc , Farabi Campus University of Tehran, Qmo, Iran

2 Professor, Farabi Campus University of Tehran, Qmo, Iran

Abstract

The paper discusses Study of Kant's deontological Ethics in Organization and comparison of it with pillars of worldly ethic in Organization and whether Kant's ethics is compatible with them. Kant's ethics is one of the most deontological theories in which intention and motive of action are basic roles. Kant merely regarded the motive of action of moral rules, respect to them. Kant put forward to distinction moral rules five formulas and if they are successfully compatible with them they will be ethical. They are: formula of universality, formula of general law of nature, formula of to be person as end in itself, formula of autonomy and formula of the kingdom of ends.pillars of worldly ethic which are the principle of honesty, the principle of ownership, the principle of validity and trust, the principle of transparency, the principle of esteem, the principle of fairness, principle of citizenship, and the principle of sensibility, are fully compatible with Kant's moral standards. Hence according to Kant's ethics can be seen as ethical However, if the target of lawmakers and agents of pillars of worldly ethic is merely Respect for the law and not profit for organization. As a result, Kant's deontological Ethics is more compatible than Teleological and Utilitarian ethics with the conditions mentioned.

Keywords

References

  1. کانت، ایمانوئل، تمهیدات: مقدمه‌ای برای هر مابعد الطبیعه آینده که به عنوان یک علم عرضه شود، ترجمه غلامعلی حداد عادل، چاپ اول، مرکز نشر دانشگاهی، تهران، 1367.
  2. خنیفر، حسین و مقیمی، ‌سیدمحمد، درآمدی به فلسفه اخلاق در سازمان (مطالعه موردی: منشورهای اخلاقی) در: مجله علمی پژوهشی پژوهش‌های فلسفی و کلامی، دانشگاه قم، سال یازدهم، شماره اول، پاییز 1388.
  3. تلر، جی. اف.، آشنایی با فلسفه، ترجمه: فریدون بازرگان، تهران، سمت، 1377
    1. Beck, L.W, A commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason, Chicago, the university of Chicago press, 1960.
    2. Copleston, Frederick, History of Philosophy, Vol 6, part II, kant, garden city, New York, image books, 1964.
    3. Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Practical Reason, tr Beck. L.W. New York, the Library of Liberal Arts, 1956.
    4. Kant, Immanuel, "Groundwork of Metaphysic of Morals", tr, Paton, H.J, pp, 53-123, in: the Moral Law, London, Hutchinson university library, 1972.
    5. Liddell, B.E.A, Kant on the Foundation of Morality, (A Modern Version of the Grundlegung), Bloomington and London, Indian university press, 1970.
      1. Paine, lynn& Deshapande, Rohit & Margolis, joshaa. D. &Bettche, kim Eric (2006) up to code Does your company’sconduct meet word – class standards?
    6. Paton, H.J, the Moral Law, London, Hutchinson university library, 1972.
    7. Paton, H.J, the Categorical Imperative, London, Hutchinson university library, 1953.
    8. Stewart, Noel, Ethics, An Introduction to Moral Philosophy, UK, Polity Press, 2009.
Organizational Culture Management
Volume 13, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
August 2015
Pages 537-557

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics