Explaining the Corruption Diffusion in Public Organizations by Analyzing the Individual and Organizational Variables and Using the Bandwagon Effect

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 MSc., Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This inquiry has attempted to explain the diffusion of corruption in public organizations by the Bandwagon Effect and the individual and organizational factors that affect it. For this purpose, the qualitative approach has been pursued and the data has been collected using the interviews conducted with the employees of public organizations and organizational experts. Accordingly, Grounded Theory has been adopted as the methodology of the research through which the data has been analyzed in three phases: open coding, axial coding and selective coding. In open coding phase, the ideas of interviewees were conceptualized and categorized; in axial coding phase, the phenomenon, casual conditions, contexts, intervening conditions, action strategies and consequences were determined; finally, the relationships among these elements, the core category and the storyline of the corruption diffusion by the Bandwagon Effect were introduced in selective coding stage. In conclusion, the main questions of this inquiry are answered.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. استراوس، انسلم؛ جولیت کربین (1392). مبانی پژوهش کیفی: فنون و مراحل تولید نظریة زمینه‌ای، مترجم: ابراهیم افشار، تهران، نی.
  2. دانایی‌فرد، حسن (1392). استراتژی‌های نظریه‌پردازی، تهران، سمت.
  3. دانایی‌فرد، حسن؛ سید مجتبی امامی (1386). «استراتژی‌های پژوهش کیفی: تأملی بر نظریه‌پردازی داده‌بنیاد»، اندیشة مدیریت راهبردی، د 1، ش 2، صص 69 ـ 97.
  4. طالقانی، غلام‌رضا؛ مصطفی محمدی (1390). مدیریت تطبیقی: نگرش بین‌المللی، تهران، علم و ادب.
    1. Elbahnasawy, N. G. & Revier, C. F. (2012). The Determinants of Corruption: Cross-Country-Panel-Data Analysis, Developing Economics, 50 (4), pp. 311-333.
    2. Dincer, O. C. & Gunalp, B. (2012). Corruption and Income Inequality in The United States, Contemporary Economic Policy, 30 (2), pp. 283-292.
    3. Goel, R. K. & Nelson, M. A. (2010). Causes of Corruption: History, Geography and Government, Journal of Policy Modeling, 32 (4), pp. 433-447.
    4. Henshel, R. L. & Johnston, W. (1987). The Emergence of Bandwagon Effects: A Theory, The Sociological Quarterly, 28 (4), pp. 493-511.
    5. Huber, W. D. (2001). Culture and Corruption: Using Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions to Explain Perceptions of Corruption, Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2383486

10. Investopedi. (2014). Bandwagon Effect, Retrieved from: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bandwagon-effect.asp.

11. Johnston, M. (2011). Corruption, Administrative, In International Encyclopedia of Political Science, Retrieved from: http://knowledge.sagepub.com/view/intlpoliticalscience/n114.xml.

12. Li, S., Triandis, H. C., & Yu, Y. (2006). Cultural Orientation and Corruption, Ethics & Behavior, 16 (3), pp. 199-215.

13. Lambsdorff, J. G. (2006). Causes and Consequences of Corruption: What do We Know from a Cross-Section of Countries?, In International Handbook of Economics Corruption, Susan Rose-Ackerman (pp. 42-90), Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

14. Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64 (2), pp. 183-207.

15. Online Etymology Dictionary. (2014). Bandwagon, Retrieved from: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bandwagon.

16. Paldam, M. (2002). The Cross-Country Pattern of Corruption: Economics, Culture and the Seesaw Dynamics, European Journal of Political Economy, 18 (2), pp. 215-240.

17. Polner, M. & Ireland, R. (2010). Overview of Literature on Corruption, World Customs Organization, Research Paper No.7.

18. Colman, A. M. (2003). Oxford Dictionary of  Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.