-

Abstract

What we are following in this research is whether there is basically a one-to-one correspondence between Ministry Of Roads and Transportation executive employees’ prevailing needs levels and their common levels or not. Employees’ prevailing needs levels are, according to Mazelo’s hierarchy needs theory, divided into five levels:
physiology, security, social, respect, self-analysis. Their common levels start from full non-participation to full participation and are respectively divided into non-participation, participation according to suggestion. mutual decision-making, and independent teams.
To carry out this research we devised some theories and by doing field\4orks thai arc in line with theories and research aims we gathered data about theories and then by using Spearman hierarchical correlation test (on the whole 25 secondary tests) we analyzed and summarized data and existing information. And we concluded that there is not enough reasons for proving the theory that there is a one-to-one correspondence between employees’ prevailing needs levels and their common levels.
By using chi - spuare (X2) test (on the whole 6 secondary tests), we are after this matter that employees with prevailing need (or needs) can prefer various levels of participation, therefore, with regards to the above tests, the deduction that there are multiple relations between employees’ prevailing needs and their common levels is valid.
Moreover by using Freedman Variance Analysis Test we ranked research variables and prioritized common levels by planning and programming a computer model (that was done by researcher) of multiple-criterion decision-making with the approach MADM and with regards to models SAW and TOPSIS. Finally, emphasizing each theories of the research, we presented the achieved results, as the results of research and offered some suggestions about the carried out research, other studies and similar researches.

Keywords