Supplier Evaluation based on Supply Chain Productivity Criteria :( The Case of Tous Automotive Industries)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Farabi Campus University of Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Branch Parand, Tehran, Iran

3 MSc Student, Islamic Azad University, Branch Parand, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Supply chain management is one of modern approach in the field of operation and production management. Nowadays success and survival of manufacturing organizations depend on effectiveness and productivity of supply chains.
This research tries to investigate contributing factor to enhance supply chain productivity. Then by using Fuzzy PROMETHE-a multiple attribute decision making (MADM) - Tous Automotive Group's supplier productivity were evaluated.
Results of research reveal that employee result, process and key performance indicators were the main contributing factors.
Finally beside of sensitivity analysis of ranking, some policies to enhance supply chain productivity. This research beside of supply chain productivity concept, proposed a mechanism to evaluation of suppliers.
 

Keywords

References

  1. 1. اصغری‌زاده، عزت‌اله؛ قاسمی، احمدرضا (1388). «مسیر تعالی عملکرد زنجیرة تأمین، شاخصی نوین در ارزیابی رقابت‌پذیری و تعالی شرکت‌ها ‌(مطالعة موردی: زنجیرة تأمین شرکت فروشگاه‌های زنجیره‌ای شهروند)». فصل‌نامة پژوهش‌های بازرگانی، شمارة 41، صفحات 72-65.

    2. اصغری‌زاده، عزت‌اله؛ مؤمنی، منصور؛ قاسمی، احمدرضا (1388). «تدوین شاخص‌های دخیل در عملکرد زنجیرة تأمین». فصل‌نامة مدیریت تحول، شمارة 3، صفحات 81-68.

    3. منهاج، محمدباقر (1390). محاسبات فازی. تهران، انتشارات دانش نگار.

    4. صفری، حسین. قاسمی، احمدرضا. عینیان، مجیده. پهلوان‌زاده، کریم. منوچهری، مسعود.(1391). نگاهی جامع به نظام‌های سنجش عملکرد. تهران، انتشارات مهربان.

    1.APO (2012). Impact of Business Excellence/Quality Awards on Enterprises under DON Strategy, Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo-Japan.

    2. Alfaro, O. J. A.; Poler, R. (2007). “Performance measurement system for business processes“. Production Planning & Control, 18(8), 641–654.

    3.Calvo-Mora, A.; Leal, A.; Roldan, J. (2005). “Relationship between the EFQM model criteria: a study in Spanish university“. Total quality Management, 16(6),741-770.

    4.Chinda, T.; Mohamed, S. (2008). “Structural equation model of construction safety culture“. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 15(2),114-131.

    5.Azevedo, S. G.; Carvalho, H.; Cruz Machado, V. (2011). “The influence of green practices on supply chain performance: A case study approach”. Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review, 47(6), 850-871.

    6.Beheshti, H. M. (2010). “A decision support system for improving performance of inventory management in a supply chain network”. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59(5), 452-467.

    7.Burgess, K.; Singh, P. J.; Koroglu, R. (2006). “Supply chain management: a structured literature review and implications for future research“. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(7), 703-729.

    8.DeMontis, A. De Toro; Pasquale; D. Bert. (2005). Criteria for quality assessment of MCDA methods. Omann, Ines; Stagl, Sigrid.

    9.Gilliams, S.; Raymaekers, D.; Muys, B.; Orshoven, J. V. (2005). “Comparing multiple criteria decision methods to extend a geographical information system on afforestation”. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 49, 142–158.

    1. Figureria, J.; Greco, S. E. (2005) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer, Newyork.
    2. Giannakis, M. (2007). “Performance measurement of supplier relationships“. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(6), 400–411.
    3. Hult, G.; Tomas M.; David, j.; Ketchen, J. R.; Mathias Arrfelt (2007). “Strategic Supply Chain Management: Improving Performance through A Culture of Competitiveness and Knowledge Development“. Strategic Management Journal, 28,1035-1056.
    4. Kemppilä, Sari. Antti Lönnqvist (2005). Subjective Productivity Measurement. Institute of Industrial Management, Tampere University of Technology, Finland, training paper..
    5. Kenneth, W.; Green, J. R.; Dwayne Whitten, R.; Anthony, I. (2012). “Aligning marketing strategies throughout the supply chain to enhance performance“. Indmarman, 41(6), 1008–1018.
    6. Lanska, M. (2012). Supply Chain Security. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Logistics & Sustainable Transport. Celje: University of Maribor, Faculty of Logistics.
    7. Magnan, G. M.; Fawcett, A. M.; Fawcett, S. E. (2011). “Supply chain success: key initiatives differentiating high-and low-performing firms”. International Journal of Procurement Management, 4(2), 181-202.
    8. Maloni, M.; Benton, W. C. (1999). Power influences in the supply chain. Fisher College of Business The Ohio State University, Fisher Hall, Columbus.
    9. Morgan, C. (2007). “Supply network performance measurement: future challenges?”. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 18(2), 255-273.
    10. Russell, D. M.; Anne, M. Hoag (2007). “People and information technology in the supply chain: Social and organizational influences on adoption“. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(2),102-122.
      1. Supply chain operations reference model (2008). “Supply Chain Council“. Avaiable at https://supply-chain.org.
      2. Tangen, S. (2007). “Performance measurement: from philosophy to practice”. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(8),726-737.
      3. Yilmaz, B.; Dagdeviren, M. (2011). “A combined approach for equipment selection: F-PROMETHEE method and zero–one goal programming”. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 11641–11650.
      4.  Zare Mehrjerdi, Y. (2009). “RFID-enabled supply chain systems with computer simulation“. Assembly Automation, 29(2),174–183.
Organizational Culture Management
Volume 13, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
August 2015
Pages 515-535

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics