An Exploration of the Employees’ Perceptions about Partisan Followership Using Zaltman’s Metaphor Elicitation Technique

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 MSc., Management Department, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economy, Vali-e-Asr University, Rafsanjan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Management Department, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economy, Vali-e-Asr University, Rafsanjan, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study was exploring the perceptions of employees in a public organization about partisan followership using Zaltman’s metaphor elicitation technique (ZMET) to achieve a deeper understanding of it. To this end, 18 research participants were selected from among the employees of an organization using conceptual sampling. The data sources were images that the research participants had identified in relation to the phenomenon of interest. During the interview session, questions related to the images were posed according to the protocol and later the responses were analyzed to discover concepts and structures. In sum, 35 structures were extracted, out of which the blind followership of partisan follower from leader, Machiavellianism of partisan follower and his/her blind fanaticism for leader, the toxic behaviors of partisan follower, the dysfunctional consequences of partisan followership in organization, the partisan follower’s flattery of the leader, and the hypocrisy and incompetence of the leader met the threshold of choice for the consensus map. According to the consensus map, the Machiavellianism and hypocrisy of partisan follower and his/her blind fanaticism for leader were recognized as causal structures and the other constructs were effects, except for the blind followership of partisan follower from leader which played a mediating role in the model.

Keywords

References

Abooyee Ardakan, M., Naddafi, T., Gholipour, A., & Shirzad, M. (2017). “Rethinking Public Administration Education Based on Updated needs by using Zaltman Elicitation Technicˮ, Iranian Journal of Management Sciences, 12(45): pp. 21-40. (In Persian)
Agho, A. (2009). “Perspectives of Senior-Level Executives on Effective Followership and Leadershipˮ, Journal of leadership and Organizational Studies, 16(2): pp. 159-166.
Baker, S. (2007). “Followership: The Theoretical Foundations of A Contemporary Constructˮ, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 14(1): pp. 50-60.
Bakhtiari, Z. & Hadavinejad, M. (2018). “The Causal Mapping of Colluding Toxic Followership Modelˮ, Organizational Resources Management Researchs, 8(2): pp. 39-55. (In Persian)
Bakhtiari, Z. & Hadavinejad, M. (2018). “The Model of Conforming Toxic Followership in Organization: A Causal Mappingˮ, Management Research in Iran, 21(4): pp. 101-124. (In Persian)
Bjugstad, D., Thach, E., Thompson, K., & Morris, A. (2006). “A Fresh Look at Fllowership: A Model for Matching Followership and Leadership Stylesˮ, Journal of Behavioural and Applied Management, 7(3): pp. 304-319.
Bligh, M. C. & Schyns, B. (2007). “Leading Questions: The Romance Lives On: Contemporary Issues Surrounding the Romance of Leadershipˮ, Leadership, 3(3): pp. 343-360.
Bufalino, G. (2018). “Followership under the Spotlight: Implications for Followership Developmentˮ, Industrial and Commercial Training, 50(2): pp. 55-60.
Carlin, R. E. & Love, G. J. (2016). “Political Competition, Partisanship and Interpersonal Trust in Electoral Democraciesˮ, British Journal of Political Science, 41(1): pp. 115-139.
Ciulla, J. (2003). The Ethics of Leadership. Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Crossman, B. & Crossman, J. (2011). “Conceptualising Followership: A Review of the Literatureˮ, Leadership, 7(4): pp. 481-497.
Dawes, C. T. & Fowler, J. H. (2009). “Partisanship, Voting, and the Dopamine D2 Receptor Geneˮ, The Journal of Politics, 71(3): pp. 1157-1171.
Efthymiou, D. E. (2018). “The Normative Value of Partisanship: When and Why Partisanship Mattersˮ, Political Studies, 66(1): pp. 192-208.
Epitropaki, O, Kark, R., Mainemelis, C., & Lord, R. G. (2017). “Leadership and Followership Identity Processes: A Multilevel Reviewˮ, The Leadership Quarterly, 28: pp. 104-129.
Guo, T. C. & Li, X. (2016). “Positive Relationship between Individuality and Social Identity in Virtual Communities: Self-Categorization and Social Identification as Distinct Forms of Social Identityˮ, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(11): pp. 680-685.‏
Hadavinejad, M. & Kalvandi, M. (2016). “Exploring Dynamics of Toxic Leadership’s Antecedents Using Interpretive Structural Modelingˮ, Organizational Behavior Studies Quarterly, 5(3): pp. 1-24. (in Persian)
Haslam, S. A., Eggins, R. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2010). “The ASPIRe Model: Actualizing Social and Personal Identity Resources to Enhance Organizational Outcomesˮ, The British Psychological Society, 76(1): pp. 83-113.
Holmberg, S. (2007). Partisanship Reconsidered. In: R. J. Dalton, H. D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behaviour, (pp. 557-570). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Howell, J. & Costley, D. (2006). Understanding behaviours for effective leadership. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Kelley, R. (1992). The power of followership. New York: Doubleday.
Kelley, R. (1988). “In Praise of Followersˮ, Harvard Business Review, 66(6): pp. 142-148.
Kelley, R. (1998). Followership in a Leadership world. In: L. Spears (Ed.), Insights on leadership: Service, stewardship, spirit and servant leadership. (pp. 170-184). Toronto: John Wiley and Sons.
Kelley, R. (2008). Rethinking Followership. In: R. E. Riggio, I. Chaleff, J. Lipman-Blumen (Eds.), The art of followership: How great follower creat great leaders and organization. (pp. 5-16). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Muirhead, R. (2006). “In Defence of Party Spiritˮ, Perspectives on Politics, 4(4): pp. 713-727.
Potter, E. & Rosenbach, W. (2006). Followers as Partners: The Spirit of Leadership. In: W. Rosenbach and R. Taylor (Eds.), Contemporary issues in leadership. (pp. 143-157). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sniderman, P. M. & Stiglitz, E. H. (2012). The Reputational Premium: A Theory of Party Identification and Policy Reasoning. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Steger, J., Manners, G., & Zimmerman, T. (1982). “Following the Leader: How to Link Management Style to Subordinate Personalitiesˮ, Management Review, 82(10): pp. 22-28.
Teng, C. T. (2017). “Impact of Avatar Identification on Online Gamer Loyalty: Perspectives of Social Identity and Social Capital Theoriesˮ, International Journal of Information Management, 37(6): pp. 601-610.
Thody, A. (2003). “Followership in Educational Organizations: A Pilot Mapping of the Territoryˮ, Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2: pp. 141-156.
Wortman, M. (1982). “Strategic Management and Changing Leader-Follower Rolesˮ, The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 18(3): pp. 371-383.
Yu, A., Matta, F. K., & Cornfield, B. (2018). “Is Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Differentiation Beneficial or Detrimental for Group Effectiveness?: A Meta-Analytic Investigation and Theoretical Integrationˮ, Academy of Management Journal, 61(3): pp. 1158-1188.
Yung, C. T. & Tsai, K. C. (2013). “Followership: An Important Partner of Leadershipˮ, Business and Management Horizons, 1(2): pp. 47-55.
Zaleznik, A. (1965). “The Dynamics of Subordinacyˮ, Harvard Business Review, 43(3): pp. 119-131.
Zaltman, G. & Zaltman, L. H. (2008). Marketing metaphoria: What deep metaphors reveal about minds of consumers. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
 
Organizational Culture Management
Volume 18, Issue 3
October 2020
Pages 539-560

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics