بررسی و تبیین اثرگذاری فضای فیزیکی معماری بر کیفیت مدیریت و ارتقاء خلاقیت دانشجویان در محیط دانشگاه‌ها از نگاه متخصصین

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار گروه معماری، دانشکده فنی انقلاب اسلامی، دانشگاه ملی مهارت، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jomc.2024.385061.1008724

چکیده

تحقیقات متعدد حاکی از آن است که محیط فیزیکی دانشگاه‌ها، از جنبه‌های مختلف، تأثیر چشمگیری بر کیفیت مدیریت و همچنین افزایش خلاقیت دانشجویان دارد. نتایج به‌دست‌آمده از این تحقیق توانایی آن را دارد که طراحی‌های نوین و مدیریت بهتر فضاهای آموزشی را الهام بخشد. این امر، علاوه بر ارائة راهکارهای مفید برای ارتقای سطح خلاقیت، می‌تواند به افزایش ظرفیت در رشد استعدادهای دانشجویان کمک کند. ازاین‌رو این سؤال مطرح می‌شود که آیا فضای فیزیکی معماری تأثیر قابل ‌توجهی بر بهبود کیفیت مدیریت و افزایش خلاقیت دانشجویان در محیط‌های دانشگاهی دارد؟ همچنین چه نوع ارتباطی بین فضای فیزیکی، کیفیت مدیریت، و خلاقیت دانشجویان برقرار است؟ برای پاسخگویی به این سؤالات با تشکیل جامعة آماری، از متخصصان رشته‌های معماری، با حجم نمونة 110، درصدد پاسخگویی به این سؤالات هستیم. روش تحقیق به‌ صورت ترکیبی از نوع توصیفی‌ـ تحلیلی و پیمایشی است و از ابزار پرسشنامه و نرم‌افزارهایی مانند SPSS و Amos برای اجرای آزمون رگرسیون و برازش مدل تحقیق استفاده شده است. نتایج کلی نشان می‌دهد تأثیر معناداری میان فضای فیزیکی معماری با کیفیت مدیریت و خلاقیت دانشجویان در محیط‌های دانشگاهی وجود دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


Alizadeh, M., Mehrpour, S., & Amidi, F. (2020). How did the physical space project go on to provide active learning conditions in the Faculty of Medicine of Tehran University of Medical Sciences? Horizon of Medical Education Development, 10(2), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.22038/hmed.2020.45604.1012
Bagheri, N. & Nouri, S. A. (2016). The role of the physical environment in the creative space of the architecture. International Journal, 2(4).
Binti Suraini, N. S. & Aziz, N. F. (2023). A review on the trend of physical learning environments and recommendations for future design approach. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, 10(1), 31-48.
Blomberg, A. J. & Kallio, T. J. (2022). A review of the physical context of creativity: A three-dimensional framework for investigating the physical context of creativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(3), 433-451.
Campos Calvo-Sotelo, P. (2014). Innovative educational spaces: Architecture, art and nature for university excellence.
De Paiva, A. (2018). Neuroscience for architecture: How building design can influence behaviors and performance. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 12(2), 132-138.
Elizondo Solís, A. M., De la Fuente Suárez, L. A., & Mireles Brito, A. (2018). Las cualidades arquitectónicas de las aulas y su relación con la ideación creativa. Designia, 6(1), 9-27.
Gifford, R. (2007). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice.
Hall, P. G. (1994). Technopoles of the world: The making of twenty-first-century industrial complexes. Routledge.
Hennessey, B. A. (2003). Is the social psychology of creativity really social? In Group Creativity (pp. 181-201).
Jie, J. (2024). Urban architectural space design and architectural management. Frontiers in Sustainable Development, 4(1), 65-68. https://doi.org/10.54691/wq0wfg36
Kakkar, G. (2022). Impact of architectural space design of office on job satisfaction and well-being. International Journal of Architecture and Infrastructure Planning, 8(2), 37-47.
Karpov, A. O. (2019). Designing the university’s creative environment: Structural-functional analysis. In Intelligent Computing: Proceedings of the 2018 Computing Conference, Vol. 2 (pp. 319-332). Springer International Publishing.
Kristensen, T. (2004). The physical context of creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(2), 89-96.
Mathe, H. (2008). Greater space means more service: Leveraging the innovative power of architecture and design (No. DR 08004). ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
McCoy, J. M. & Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3-4), 409-426.
Mishra, P., Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Henriksen, D. (2018). The architecture of creative learning environments. In Creativity, technology & education: Exploring their convergence (pp. 103-109).
Mojtahedi, M., Kamardeen, I., Rahmat, H., & Ryan, C. (2020). Flipped classroom model for enhancing student learning in construction education. Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 146(2), 05019001.
Moosavian, S. (2022). Recognition and analysis of theoretical models of environmental psychology with emphasis on the role of human experience in perception of the environment aesthetics.
Ovbiagbonhia, A. R., Kollöffel, B., & Brok, P. D. (2019). Educating for innovation: Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and of their own innovation competence. Learning Environments Research, 22, 387-407.
Pepper, G. L. (2008). The physical organization as equivocal message. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(3), 318-338.
Rezaei, H. (2020). A creative cycle of promotion: From architectural creativity to the sense of place and its resulting creativeness. Space Ontology International Journal, 9(4), 15-27.
Rezaei, H., Keramati, G., Dehbashi Sharif, M., & Nasirsalami, M. (2020). Architectural creativity as architecture of creativity; analysis and rating of the physics-based psychological effects of the sense of place on environment users’ creativity; case study: Higher education institutions of Kermanshah. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 13(31), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2020.133277.1550
Rocha, Á. & Freixo, J. (2015). Information architecture for quality management support in hospitals. Journal of Medical Systems, 39, 1-11.
Sabir, B. (2020). Effects of restorative environments on creativity in case of architecture education. In EAAE Annual Conference Proceedings (pp. 242-257).
Sadykova, S., Semenyuk, O., Khvan, E., & Kuc, S. (2016). Development of students’ creative skills through architectural workshops. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 18(3), 223-231.
Sailer, K. (2013). Organizational learning and physical space—How office configurations inform organizational behaviors. In Learning Organizations: Extending the Field (pp. 103-127). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Samsonova, E. & Kim, A. (2023). Art and creative spaces in the context of architectural and art education. Urbanistika, 55-66. https://doi.org/10.7256/2310-8673.2023.2.40756
Shah, N. S. B. N. B., Samad, M. H. A., & Hassan, K. A. K. (2019). Impact of architectural design studio provision on students’ creativity: An initial findings. European Proceedings of Multidisciplinary Sciences.
Shakeri, M., Arghiani, M., & Mahvash, M. (2022). The effect of academic environments' quality on improvement of participation in learning process; case study: University of Bojnord. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 14(37), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2020.192148.1922
Soares, I., Venhorst, V., Weitkamp, G., & Yamu, C. (2022). The impact of the built environment on creativity in public spaces of Dutch university campuses and science parks. Journal of Urban Design, 27(1), 91-109.
Soares, I., Yamu, C., & Weitkamp, G. (2020). The relationship between the spatial configuration and the fourth sustainable dimension creativity in university campuses: The case study of Zernike campus, Groningen, the Netherlands. Sustainability, 12(21), 9263.
Storvang, P. (2016). Space as organisational strategy.
Strachan-Regan, K. & Baumann, O. (2024). The impact of room shape on affective states, heart rate, and creative output. Heliyon, 10(6).
Suckley, L. & Nicholson, J. (2018). Enhancing creativity through workspace design. In The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity at Work (pp. 245-263).
Thomas, M. (2019). How space affects emergent strategy: A study of the role physical space plays in the generation of social interactions in organisations. Lancaster University (United Kingdom).
Thoring, K. (2019). Designing creative space: A systemic view on workspace design and its impact on the creative process.
Thoring, K., Goncalves, M. G., Mueller, R. M., Badke-Schaub, P., & Desmet, P. (2017). Inspiration space: Towards a theory of creativity-supporting learning environments. In The Design Management Academy 2017 International Conference: Research Perspectives on Creative Intersections (pp. 1539-1561). The Design Research Society.
Thoring, K., Luippold, C., & Mueller, R. M. (2012). Creative space in design education: A typology of spatial functions. In DS 74: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Engineering & Product Design Education (E&PDE12) Design Education for Future Wellbeing (pp. 6-7). Antwerp, Belgium.
Thoring, K., Mueller, R. M., Desmet, P., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2020). Spatial design factors associated with creative work: A systematic literature review. AI EDAM, 34(3), 300-314.
Zhao, L. (2022). Security design of university campus landscape based on BIM. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022, 8441141.